Washington and Hamilton’s plan was to mobilize an army to fight against the rebel but other congress men thought it will be unwise to retaliate with force because it will lead to the destruction of other security and order (pg 120). Wyatt was driven from Southwark by the threats of Sir John Brydges, afterward Lord Chandos, who was prepared to fire on the suburb with the guns of the Tower. Thomas Wyatt was a brave soldier and an excellent leader but he was also known for his recklessness and short temper. The people form an organized resistance against the government until it changes itself. This was a rebellion led by nobles – principally Sir Thomas Wyatt from Kent, Sir Peter Carew from Devon, Sir James Croft from Herefordshire and the Duke of Suffolk from Leicestershire. They failed to capture London. One unfortunate side effect of Wyatt's Rebellion was that it hastened the demise of the unfortunate Lady Jane Grey. This was a form of internal legislation because it required these sellers to keep the navy’s stock of trees aside before selling to other purchasers. Also, he had played a large part in crushing the earlier Prayer Book Rebellion there. The following day Sir James Croft delivered a message to Elizabeth at Ashridge House in Hertfordshire, but realizing that under the circumstances a rebellion would be unsafe, Croft gave up. On 26 January Wyatt occupied Rochester, and issued a proclamation to the county. ALAN . Loades, consider the rebellion to have been primarily motivated by political considerations, not easily separated from religious ones in the 16th century, and notably the desire to prevent the unpopular marriage of Queen Mary I to Prince Philip of Spain. He demanded that the Tower of London should be surrendered to him, and the Queen put under his charge. How much did the French pay for the return of Boulogne? Additionally, all three of these Acts were passed by Parliament to try and gain some type of power, monetary or in other ways, over the colonies. The rebellion proved disastrous for the Wyatt family, as they lost their title and lands, including the family home, Allington Castle. ", Kerr, Anne, and Wright, Edmund. Overall, the Renaissance period benefitted Europe when discussing the bettered makeup of their society.…, The Roman empire was certainly not a failure because the empire has done great things that have made a huge positive impact on the world. Wyatt’s rebellion posed a threat to Tudor governance but it was not aimed at deposing Mary and thus posed Mary’s hold on the throne less of a threat. However, one similarity between the Declaratory Act and the Coercive Acts is that they were both issued in response to a previous action taken by either the colonists or Parliament. The Tudor period can be seen as a time of unrest as each Tudor monarch had at least one rebellion during their However, it was a short-term success as relations had collapsed, meaning that at the time it could be seen as a failure to achieve the objective as there was no certainty. This choice of a foreign marriage was unpopular among the English. Degree of threat The main aim of Wyatt's rebellion was not regime change, but to force a change of policy – specifically, to prevent Mary's planned “Spanish marriage” to Philip II. Herefordshire, Devon, Leicestershire. Learn how and when to remove this template message, John Harington, 1st Baron Harington of Exton, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wyatt%27s_rebellion&oldid=1013048701, Short description is different from Wikidata, Articles needing additional references from December 2009, All articles needing additional references, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License, Thorp, Malcolm R. "Religion and the Wyatt Rebellion of 1554. Richards suggests that Wyatt 's rebellion posed a serious threat to Mary. Suffolk proved more determined, but only managed to raise a force of 140 rebels, many of whom were his own men. Lasting from the 14th to the 17th century, the Renaissance time period, contrastingly, emphasized the importance of individual growth and creativity. The Tea Act legislation was passed which lowered taxes on tea; however tea was only imported from the East India Company. However, when Elizabeth, herself a Protestant and distant relative of the Wyatt family, ascended the throne in 1558, she restored the family titles and lands. Elizabeth remained imprisoned as a precautionary measure. An informer named William Thomas claimed that the conspirators in fact intended to assassinate the Queen and named John Fitzwilliam as the assassin. Boston seemed to be the center of rebellious acts. Not a threat Threat CHALLENGE: Overall, how much of a threat was the Wyatt’s rebellion? However, Guy has a different view. [2] Though the unrest was not universal, it was symptomatic of a wide range of discontent among the English populace. Abergavenny and Southwell were deserted by their men, who either disbanded or went over to Wyatt. The whiskey rebellion became a well-regulated militia who opposed only for righteous reasons.…, In summary, the Treaty of London did provide some security for Henry VIII, therefore achieving this objective and the relationship with France added further security as France was seen to be an important opponent to Henry. At first, the queen's supporters, led by Lord Abergavenny and Sir Robert Southwell, the sheriff, appeared to be able to suppress the rising with ease, routing a rebel force of 500 at Hartley Wood on 28 January. This meant that when Wyatt came to London, he found the gates shut. As more time passed with the rebels not being able to get into the city, Wyatt’s men drifted away and dissipated. The fear of England becoming re-Catholicised combined with the proposed marriage between Mary and Philip of Spain, led to the Wyatt Rebellion of 1554. Otis even says that they just made a mistake, and a single mistake or even a few mistakes does not make the country poisonous to its core. This article examines John Proctor's literary response to conspiracies and uprisings against the Queen, The History of Wyatt's Rebellion (1554). The rising now seemed so formidable that the Queen and Council sent a deputation to Wyatt to ask for his terms. Although the charges made against the king seemed valid enough to declare independence, that was not the case and the king was wrongly accused and the charges were…, The whiskey rebellion became a force that threatened the constitution on the country. He now had 3,000 men at his command. On 22 January 1554, he summoned a meeting of his friends at his castle of Allington, and 25 January was now fixed for the rising. Wyatt's Rebellion was a popular uprising in England in 1554, named after Thomas Wyatt, one of its leaders. The rebel army then broke up. A sense of freedom and individual improvement was evident during this time period, prompting Europe for an increase in culture which would then lead to advancements in the knowledge of subjects such as art, architecture and literature. In this Essay I will Elaborate on what I mean and make you see why the empire was not failure.…, So, what happens when this contract of trust between the government and its people is breached? 5 Answers. How far do you agree that Wyatt’s rebellion was a serious threat to Mary’s authority? Answer Save. The Wyatt rebellion failed for a combination of reasons including the actions of Mary (remaining calm and level-headed), the failings of Wyatt’s army and other factors. They would then replace Mary with her half-sister Elizabeth, who would then marry Lord Devon. Protesting against the government is legal but anyone who takes up arms will be considered a rebel. Therefore, the inability of the rebels to gain access to the city shows us that the rebellion was not that serious a threat to, Wyatt's Rebellion: A Threat To Tudor Governance. And how did it the events affect Mary's position? Beyond the beliefs of the leaders, the rebellion acted as a way for the lower classes to voice their frustrations. Fletcher and MacCulloch put forward the view that by virtue of its location and proximity to London, it was a serious threat. The populace heard rumours and stories about the supposed sacking and pillaging of villages on the road to London by the rebels. It is impossible to fully separate the religious and political reasons for the uprising. The fear of sacking was not the only reason for the gates being shut. Of the other ringleaders, Sir Peter Carew was imprisoned but released; Sir James Croft was tried and found guilty, but would be pardoned; and William St Loe also evaded punishment. The rebellion arose out of concern over Queen Mary I's determination to marry Philip of Spain, which was an unpopular policy with the English. Was the Wyatt rebellion actually a serious threat to Mary and her position on the throne? Although Wyatt’s rebellion was, when compared to the riots and rebellions that visited the Tudor Dynasty, rather small in size, it had a large impact in that Queen Mary’s authority as Monarch was questioned and ridiculed by the actions that drove so close to her residence in 1554. Wyatt’s Rebellion in February 1554 was a direct threat to the Crown. How did Northumberland improve crown finances? The Wyatt rebellion must be understood against the background of religious reaction which engulfed England following Mary's accession in July 1553. Wyatt’s rebellion posed a threat to Tudor governance but it was not aimed at deposing Mary and thus posed Mary’s hold on the throne less of a threat. Henry Grey, Duke of Suffolk, Sir Peter Carew and Edward Courtenay, the Earl of Devon were some of his fellow conspirators in the revolt of 1554. [3], The rebellion had an unintended consequence of leading to the eventual execution of Lady Jane Grey. However, the reach of the rebellion was wider than that, as Wyatt had three allies: Earl of Devon in Devon Duke of Suffolk in Leicestershire After Queen Mary I’s rise to the throne there was much debate over the possibility that England would revert to Catholicism. The insolence of these demands turned an initially sympathetic London against Wyatt, and Mary was able to rally the capital to her cause on 1 February by delivering a rousing speech at the Guildhall. A detachment of the London trainbands was sent against him under the command of the elderly Duke of Norfolk. Wyatt surrendered, and was tried and executed along with approximately 90 rebels, many of whom were hanged, drawn and quartered. It also shows that the Londoners were prepared to come out in support of Mary which greatly enhanced her position. Mary was devoted to the Catholic faith and wished to revoke the Protestant policies of her half brother, Edward VI, as well as the 1534 Statute of Supremacy. Richards suggests that Wyatt 's rebellion posed a serious threat to Mary. Relevance. In order to finally get the colonists to agree to this legislature, above market prices were guaranteed for navy white pines, increasing British control in the colonies once more.…, During the time of the Middle Ages, religion was known to be a large part of European common life. Rebellions caused a serious threat to monarchs; and as a result of the War of The Roses and Henry VII’s usurpation in 1485, the Tudor Dynasty had effectively been founded on Rebellion so it may be possible to assume that the Tudor Dynasty could be removed by rebellion. Why was Wyatt's rebellion not a threat? Would be helpful to my studies investigating how serious the Wyatt rebellion was in terms of threat to the monarch. Refusing to give up, the rebels marched to Kingston. The rebellion led by Sir Thomas Wyatt was crushed by Mary. Favourite answer. He was refused entry to Coventry and gave himself up. The rebellion got all the way to the gates of London and this shows how much of a threat it was. This is evidenced through Wyatt s Rebellion in 1554, whereby Wyatt and his supporters conspired to replace Mary I with the Princess Elizabeth and marry her to Edward Courtenay. He points out that Wyatt was isolated with the other uprisings failing to materialise and also was stopped by the Londoners. Wyatt's army reached Southwark on 3 February. Many country people and local gentry collected. The Roman Empire was also not a failure because of all the great things that they had done like improve architecture and make it better and more stronger. Opposition to the Spanish Marriage: Wyatt’s Rebellion and it’s threat A key point of analysis for any rebellion is how much of a threat it is to the Monarch on the throne. Others involved included the French ambassador, Antoine de Noailles, who knew that a Spanish king on the throne of England was not in the best interests of France, and the mathematician Leonard Digges. The failure of Wyatt’s Rebellion of 1554 would have profound but unintended consequences for the course of English history. The precise reason for the uprisings has been much debated. "The Wyatt's rebellion was the rebellion which posed the greatest threat to the stability of the Tudor government in the period 1536- 1558." These threats can be seen as both very serious and not so serious. Courtenay was exiled and would die in the city of Padua, Italy. Elizabeth, meanwhile, had been summoned to Court and was held incommunicado, in mortal fear. Dissertation Writing On 16 November 1553 a Parliamentary delegation had waited upon the Queen and formally requested that she choose an English husband, the obvious though tacit candidate being her kinsman Edward Courtenay, recently created Earl of Devon. Not Dangerous - There was no foreign support as almost all support was gathered from the West Country. Meanwhile, a fleet of French ships would prevent Philip of Spain from reaching England. An example of parliamentary policy that began to irritate the colonists about Britain’s use of parliamentary power were the White Pines Acts (1711, 1722, and 1729). Wyatt himself, after being severely tortured in the hope of extracting a confession implicating Elizabeth, was beheaded at Tower Hill and his body quartered. The bridge there was also destroyed, but the rebels repaired it and crossed over. This effectively halted the rebellion. But they also joined the rebels, raising their numbers to 4,000, while the Duke fled to London. They met little resistance as they marched through the outskirts of London, but were stopped by the inhabitants of Ludgate. What happened in the year 1554? Under increased pressure of time, the planned rebellion was moved forward and went awry. Nothing could be proved, but the degree to which she was privy to the preparations has been questioned by modern scholars. Carew attempted to raise support for the uprising in Devon, but the Protestant nobles there proved unwilling to commit treason, and the county's peasant inhabitants were largely Catholic. He informed the Lord Chancellor, Bishop Stephen Gardiner, who on 21 January arrested Devon, who revealed that there was indeed a rebellion planned. How far do you agree that Wyatt’s rebellion was a serious threat to Mary’s authority? Wyatt's Rebellion was a popular uprising in England in 1554, named after Thomas Wyatt, one of its leaders. 11 How effective was foreign support for Western? Though many modern-day historians have given less weight to religion as a motive for the rebellion, it is important to note the high anti-Catholic sentiment that existed in England at the time. She argues that by virtue of the numbers involved, Wyatt was set to march on and challenge London, the hub of Tudor power. If the colonies had just listened to Britain and the king, then they wouldn’t be trying to blame someone else for something they caused. Lv 6. Instead, the British turned to the colonies, placing multiple tax acts on them to help pay for the war. The Pilgrimage of Grace of 1536 was far more serious than the rebellions of 1549 (the Western Rebellion and Kett's Rebellion) and 1554 (Wyatt's Rebellion). Nevertheless, all the rebel leaders were committed Protestants. [1] While some would have welcomed a return to the papacy, many Protestants were deeply opposed. ’ Hence, historians may argue that Thomas Wyatt’s motives were spurred by the prospect of a Spanish king and were not religiously driven. The Roman Empire has done great things in Religion especially with Christianity because they were on of the first followers of Christianity and they made improvements and changes to the religion that are still followed today by millions of people. When the British Parliament tried to pass tax acts in Great Britain, citizens grew hostile and the acts were unsuccessful. The most significant reason as to why Wyatt’s rebellion failed was the actions of the Queen. But the Spanish marriage was unpopular, and Kent was more affected by the preaching of the reformers than most of the country districts of England. However, they still protested against it and the King repealed it.…, The charges against the king for tax and trade may have been slightly valid, but Britain had the right to regulate trade and add taxes because they owned the thirteen colonies. The rebellion arose out of concern over Queen Mary I's determination to marry Philip of Spain, which was an unpopular policy with the English. As more and more Catholics were appointed to the Privy Council and other important posts, these fears began to grow larger. The rebels explained that the reason for the rebellion was "to prevent us from over-running by strangers." Queen Mary's overthrow was implied in the rebellion, although not expressly stated as a goal. Although this expectation to resistance against Britain is there, Otis did not believe that Britain was an immoral leadership that must be eradicated. There were three main threats to the throne of Elizabeth I; The Spanish Armada in 1588, The Northern Rebellion in 1569 and Mary Queen of Scots. The Wyatt rebellion may have broken out due to a factional struggle. On the one hand, historians argue that the rebellion significantly challenged Mary’s position as queen, whilst on the other; the event has been described by historians such as Diarmaid MacCulluch as a demonstration of ‘the bankruptcy of rebellion as a way of solving problems’. News that Sir Peter Carew was spreading dissent at Exeter in Devon, by saying publicly that a Spanish king would bring the Spanish Inquisition, reached the Court in January 1554. 8 out of 14 leaders in Wyatt’s rebellion were protestant and supported for the rising in Maidstone where Mary’s martyrs came from. It is argued by some that the rebellion was poised a serious threat to Mary’s authority thus in the following essay I shall be exploring particular reasoning’s ultimately concluding with a judgement on how far I agree with the statement that ‘Wyatt’s rebellion was a serious threat to Mary’s authority.’. The actual level of threat that the Wyatt rebellion posed to Mary’s authority is a subject of much debate. By this time, the French ships found themselves unable to maintain their position and returned to France. At first, these taxes that were implemented were not too serious because items like sugar were not widely used by the colonists. Elizabeth was intensely interrogated and in danger of execution, but managed to be spared due to evasive and intelligent responses, in which she maintained she had been unaware of the planned uprising. The social charges were both caused by the colonists themselves and not Britain in any way. The last reason that makes me believe that the Roman Empire was not a failure was their government because their government was so good many great nations still follow their rules and way of governing up to this day. How did Northumberland reduce expenditure? The Wyatt Rebellion, or Wyatt Revolt, was an uprising that took place in England in 1554, named after its leader, Thomas Wyatt the Younger. Most colonists reacted the same way to different acts, because those acts although different, had very similar…, The British realized that they were not able to raise taxes in their own country based what happened during the cider riots of 1763. Therefore, religion was an important source of discontent after Henry VIII’s reign up to Elizabeth’s reign. Fairly dangerous - whilst the rebellion was well-thought-out and effective, they had no realistic chance of bringing back Catholicism as this was the opposite of Government goals at the time. Unlike Kett’s and the Western Rebellion it was directed at Queen Mary I, in particular, her … Mary's supporters occupied London Bridge in force, and the rebels were unable to penetrate into the city. He straight way published a proclamation at Maidstone which was addressed 'unto the commons' of Kent. [13]However, despite the want to replace Mary, this was more likely a reaction to her religious policy, and opposition to a Catholic monarch. Wyatt, on the other hand, downplayed religion and highlighted faction but motivated by religious grievances against Mary. Mary had recently come to power causing a shake up in office; those struggling to keep their place were worried that Mary’s marriage to Philip would create an alliance to Spain giving Spaniards favour in court. Other rebels included Edward Courtenay, Earl of Devon, Sir Henry Isley, Lord John Grey of Wilton, Lord Thomas Grey (Henry Grey's brother), Sir William Thomas (Clerk of the Privy Council), Sir Nicholas Throckmorton, John Harington, 1st Baron Harington of Exton, Sir Nicholas Arnold and Sir William St Loe. Assess the validity of this view. The 'Nine Days Queen', who had been little more than a pawn in the hands of her ambitious father-in-law, was considered a threat to the throne and was beheaded, along with her husband and her father, the Duke of Suffolk. Maier, when discussing earlier greivances over the White Pines Act, investigated why the colonists opposed this form of government intervention so much.…, Natural freedoms, like freedom of speech and press, were removed from the colonists ' way of life causing "clamours, discord, confusion, mobs, riots, insurrections, rebellions" (Seabury).
Family Matters - Watch Online, Doraemon Chinese Version, Korra Vs Aang, Taser En Español, Wednesday Fast Food Deals Edmonton, Hyperion Ng Raspberry Pi 4, Rune Factory 3 Easter Eggs, It Burns A Lovely Light, Why Was Robinson Court Martialed While In The Army, Mera Justice League Snyder Cut, Dündar Bey Wife In Ertuğrul,